"StarWare 2nd and 3rd Editions"
If there was ever a bible on astronomical equipment, this would be it. While not a flashy book by any means (no color pics in this softbound book), there is so much information packed into one volume that it would take you a weeks to cull all the information offered in Phil's book from other sources. We are currently up to the 4th edition, and if you, like me like collecting books, you will probably end up getting all editions. What is cool about this is that you can follow the progression and evolution of the telescope scene, through the eyes of a well known astronomy writer (Phil writes for Astronomy Magazine and frequently does scope and accessory reviews). Times have changed quite a bit since the first book was published, and Phil takes note of this. For instance Phil discusses the proliferation of high quality telescopes from China and Taiwan (Mysteries of the Orient), formerly the source of poor quality beginner scopes. The entry of telescopes from Synta (China scope giant that took Celestron) and Guan Sheng (Taiwan) has greatly reduced the prices of scopes and truly brought scopes to the masses. This truly is the golden age for naturalist of the night sky.
The book begins by giving you a brief history of telescopes and binoculars, and then goes on to highlight binocular and the telescope types, and their pros and cons, after which he discusses mounting issues (alt-az versus equatorial). Then we dive deep into the different telescope types (split into the three main scope families: refractor, reflector and catadioptrics) and Phil spotlights the different brands and gives a mini review of sorts of the different telescopes. Phil use of his experience with telescopes over the years in his scope reviews for this book. While not as detailed as his writeups for Astronomy Magazine, the short reviews in Star Ware contains all the important information one needs to make an informed choice! Phil puts a cap on small scopes however and discusses scope larger than 70mm for refractors and 114mm for newtonian reflectors. His reasoning is that users will quickly lose interest using a scope smaller than that due to the lack of detail. In this day and age, it is also just better to start with a larger scope since prices are so competitive. Its not uncommon for people to start out with a 80mm refractor, like the ubiquitous Synta made Orion 80ST's (also sold by Celestron, just in a black tube as opposed to Orion's white) or a 4.5" EQ newtonian. It is also very evident that many of the major brands obtain their scopes from the same manufacturers and Phil highlights this fact (i.e. Celestron and Orion get their scopes from Synta in China). It is a very enjoyable read.
"StarWare 4th Edition front and back"
Besides telescopes, Phil also covers binoculars, the same way he covers telescopes, by brand. Again his experience with a plethora of different equipment allows him to make very good comparisons between different brands. Here we see the same phenomenon, with different brands importing the same binoculars. Again the influx of higher quality product from the east has once again allowed end user to benefit. For instance, giant binoculars in the 70mm range, there were once out of the reach of most users due to price are now readily available. In the past, a beginner might start with a 7x50 or 10x50mm binoculars. These days its not uncommon to start with a 15x70mm binoculars. These are readily available from Oberwerks (they specialize in big binocs), Celestron and even Orion! Even BIG binocs such as the 25x100mm are easily affordable now. be warned though, for these monster 100mm binocs, you need a hefty mount to hold them up. They are not your average grab and go's! Buyers be warned though as some companies are more lax with their QC and have lower specs than other (i.e fully coated versus fully multi coated optics).
And if that is not enough, he also covers all manner of telescope accessories from filters for planetary and deep sky objects, CCD camera's down to observing vest and books! He even makes a recommendation list of eyepieces for beginner, intermediate and advanced observers. Yup nothing is left out. as I said before this is the definitive guide to accessories for the amateur astronomer. He caters to everyone, from the wet behind the ears newbies to amateurs who have been at it for years!!!!
Oh and yes there is more. There is the section for the homemade astronomer too. He highlights home projects such as observing chairs, binocular mounts, etc. An added plus with the older editions is an observing section at the end where Phil list several of his favourite objects and how to find them by star hopping. This section was so popular that it was later reformatted into a new book Star Watch. Overall this series is a MUST read and an awesome addition to your astronomy library.
Deep Sky Companion Series Stephen James O'Meara (Cambridge Press)
The Messier Objects
The Caldwell Objects
Hidden Treasures Treasures
The Secret Deep
Southern Gems
"Caldwell Objects front and back"
"Hidden Treasures front and back"
"The Secret Deep front and back"
Any cons to these books? As mentioned these are not really books you want to carry into the field with you. They are hard cover books that are bound rather tightly and impossible to lay flat on a surface (to read you need to either press down on both sleeves of the book, or hold the pages open with two hands). The pages are also glossy and can be ruined by dew. You will also need a separate set of detailed maps for star hopping to locate these objects. The maps provided with the text are woefully inadequate. There are large scale maps on the inner flaps at the front and ends of the book show the rough location of the objects in relation to the constellations, and some smaller scale maps with each object. None of these go very deep in terms of magnitude. Also another "gripe" of mine is repeated objects in two of his books (that is why I got Southern Gems as a Kindle Book). I kinda guess that this would be the case since the Caldwell Object spotlights some of the best southern deep sky objects (and so does the Southern Gems book).
So for the budding deep sky observer, these series of books in a must read. Many experienced astronomers would also want this collection on their shelves.
Nicely written reviews - here are my comments on Star Ware (my comments on the Deep Sky Companion books by Stephen James O'Meara will follow shortly):
ReplyDeleteo) ...you will probably end up getting all editions. What is cool about this is that you can follow the progression and evolution of the telescope scene...
I currently have the 4th edition, but a 1st edition (1994) copy will be arriving (to me) very soon.
o) Its not uncommon for people to start out with a ... 4.5" EQ newtonian.
Yes, many people start out with a 4.5" EQ newtonian - unfortunately, too often its the "Bird-Jones" Celestron Astromaster 114 EQ. Just check out the no. of You Tube videos showing beginners proudly displaying this scope.
o) He even makes a recommendation list of eyepieces for beginner, intermediate and advanced observers.
Excellent points are made about the cons of Plossls - 1) uncomfortable short eye-relief for the shorter focal length EPs (<=10mm) and 2) 1.25" 40mm Plossls have narrow FOVs compared to 32mm Plossls. I own an Orion Highlight Plossl 40mm EP which goes unused.
Looks down on Expanse wide-field EPs, calling them great sacrificial eyepieces. They are currently my workhorse EPs and I prefer their views over Plossls.
o) This section was so popular that it was later reformatted into a new book Star Watch...
The Deep Sky: An Introduction (2007) by Phil has about 300 objects listed, more than Star Watch I believe. I have Deep Sky and it’s very good.
o) See 4th edition - P.65, Figure 4.4.
I don't mean to be cruel, but this picture is hilarious...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAgree with your comments Terry. I too do not agree with some of Phil's views, especially the ones concerning the Orion Expanse ep's. I also happen to like those ep's very much, so much so I re-acquired the 15 mm and 20 mm Expanses. I also had the 9 mm and 6 mm Expanse clones, although those suffered from flaring. They work well with refractors, not so good with short focal length reflectors due to coma.
ReplyDeleteI am aware of Phil's other book. I don't have that in my collection. Will have to get a copy at some stage. Are there many new objects not covered by the other book?
With regards to the Bird-Jones newts, the problem is that they are so ubiquitous and most of them are very poorly executed. The design has the potential to yield slightly above average views (as evidenced by my Powerseeker 127 mm). However most of them are mediocre at best. The best beginner's scope, in my opinion is still a good long focal length newtonian or a smaller refractor.
My 20mm Expanse came with the Orion ST80A, which was ill-suited for that scope (coma was horrendous!). Works well with the Powerseeker 114 though, along with the 9mm Expanse that came with the ST80A. I also have a 6mm Expanse clone which gives me 150X on the Powerseeker - this is the highest magnification I use on this scope, no need for a Barlow.
ReplyDeleteThe Orion Starblast 4.5 EQ model came with a 15mm Expanse, which I haven't used yet (I should) and a 6mm Expanse (haven't used because of the Expanse-clone I already have). Phil mentions ghosting on the 9mm & 6mm Expanse EPs, which I haven't noticed.
"The Deep Sky" has about 300 objects, while "Star Watch" has a little over 125, according to what's described online (I've never looked through Star Watch). I did take "Deep Sky" to a few observing sessions in order to seek out "new" objects a while back - found out about and observed NGC 6888 (the Crescent nebula) in Cygnus because of this book.
Hopefully my 1st edition copy of Star Ware will be at my doorstep when I get home tonight.
Yup same experience here. I like the 20mm and 15mm, but only on long focal length scopes. They do pretty poorly when it comes to fast reflectors. The Expanse ep's work superbly with my C8 though ;) As for the 9mm and 6mm ones, I agree with Phil. I had the same problem with them, but it was more like flaring from poor baffling or something. I used them exclusively for a few years, and then tried the Celestron ED's, which had the same problem. That was when I got fed up, sold them off and got my TeleVue 6mm Radian...superb eye relieve, superb FOV and excellent baffling...the perfect planetary eyepiece in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteFor wide field, I had the same problem with my newtonian's, and that is why I went premium. I figured I spend so much time doing visual (in the past) with fast reflectors, I needed these. My trusty beat up Meade SWA 24.5mm has an amazing flat field for a wide field ep. Almost up there with the TeleVue 24 Panoptic (which is a hair better with edge of FOV correction). Someday I will get an even larger FOV ep. My beef with the 82 degree FOV ep's is that I can't take the whole FOV in without moving my head around. For me the the 68 degree FOV of my 24.5mm does a superb job.
Maybe i should check out Phil's Deep Sky book. The Starwatch is more of a starhopping guide. For that purpose it is excellent as it has good charts.....
All my observing since April 2013 has been with an F/8.0 Newt, so I guess my current EPs will suffice for now. My two bigger scopes currently waiting in the wings are both fast F/5.0 Newts, so I may start going higher-end depending on how much a comedown the views are with Plossl and Expanse EPs on these larger aperture short focal length scopes.
ReplyDeletePhil's Deep Sky book came out in 1997, not 2007 as I stated previously, so it predates Star Watch (2003). No detailed star charts as in Star Watch, but we already have our detailed charts. I need to go through Deep Sky to find out which objects I haven't yet seen from his list...
I see that you reviewed Star Watch almost a decade ago on Amazon.com.
I meant no detailed charts in Deep Sky (not Star Watch) - but I need to cross-check his list in that book with my database.
DeleteThoughts on Deep Sky Companions and a few other books:
ReplyDeleteI currently own "Hidden Treasures" and "The Secret Deep", which I was fortunate to pick up unused for $17.86 and $11.97, respectively. The objects in these books were chosen by Stephen for being bright enough to be visible with small scopes in moderately dark skies, with the objects in the first book being brighter overall than those in the second. So far, I have not used these books to plan my observing sessions, but I plan to do so now.
I just cross-checked his "Hidden Treasures" list (109 + 20 = 129) with my observing database - found out that I've seen 83 out of 129 (64%) already. So my plan is to hunt down those objects I have not yet seen (that are currently visible this time of year) at my next observing sessions.
I’ll do the same with “The Secret Deep” list and crosscheck it with my database to see which ones I haven’t observed/logged/sketched yet. I’m very curious to see how many of these are already logged in my database.
If Stephen’s “The Caldwell Objects” and “Southern Gems” were available new at heavily discounted prices (less than $20) on Amazon.com , I would snap them up in a heartbeat.
I have never used Burnham’s three-volume “Celestial Handbook”, but I have “Observing Handbook and Catalogue of Deep-Sky Objects” (1990) by Christian B. Luginbuhl and Brian A. Skiff. It contains data on 2828 DSOs, including visual descriptions of what you would expect to see using scopes of various apertures, starting with 60mm if it can be seen through such a small scope. An excellent comprehensive reference, which many deep sky enthusiasts consider a classic work as well as an excellent deep-sky observing guide. I also have the voluminous “Complete Guide to the Herschel Objects” (2013), with 2,435 Herschel objects listed. .
I have all of O'Meara's books in hardcopy with the exception of Southern Gem's, his latest one. The only reason I decided not to get that one in hardcopy was due to the fact that a lot of the objects had been covered previously by his other books (some Caldwell objects for instance). Still a very good book to have.
DeleteThese days I like having electronic copies (i.e. Kindle books) as those don't get dew on them, plus I can have multiple books with me if I need to cross reference anything on my phone, Ipod touch. Also don't need printed starmap's anymore as I have apps that go way deeper than any printed atlas can...plus it list all the details of the objects, rise and set times and even maps that reflect what objects are visible any given date and time! I find that a major leap forward....
Yup his book is quite old. I think it was meant to be more of a guidebook rather than a starhopping book. The observing sections in the old StarWare books had more of a starhopping feel to them. While Star Watch was good, it was nowhere near as comprehensive as Turn Left at Orion. That book, to me is still the standard by which all beginner's starhopping books should live up to and one I would recommend, especially now that it is more field friendly (spiral bound). In my opinion any book that was published for the purpose of field work should be printed on heavier paper and be spiral bound. that way the book can be opened up. I used to carry my Deep Sky Companion books into the field, but that was when I used the boot of my car as a table ;)
ReplyDeleteI love O'Meara's book. I have even communicated with him through e mail once when he asked if he could mention my naked eye observations of NGC 5128 from Leyburn, Australia (he read my observing report somewhere).
I got the spiral-bound version of "Turn Left" when it first came out. Extensively updated (including the cover picture) - but I used it as an armchair book mainly.
DeleteMy primary beginner's field guide when I got back into astronomy was "The Observer's Sky Atlas" by Erich Karkoschka. Used it for the Orion Funscope as well as the SkyScanner.
That article was published in Sky and Telescope...
ReplyDeleteJust got the first edition of Star Ware, which is 20 yrs old. Fascinating to see what brands and models were around back then. In particular, I like his reviews of 4.5" F/8 Newts that were available - apparently there were a lot more of those around back then. Makes me want to seek some of them out online, especially the Orion models (they no longer market 114/900 mm Newts).
ReplyDeleteUnder reflectors, he also has an entry for Parks Optical, of which Scope City has a ton of in their Simi Valley showroom, probably still there. This brand was removed from the 4th edition, probably because they were way too expensive for the most people back then.