Orion StarShoot Deep-Space CCD Color Imaging Camera Specifications
- Sony® ExView HAD™ ICX259AK color CCD sensor
- 1/3" CCD sensor size
- 6.50µm (H) × 6.25µm (V) pixel size
- 752 x 582 pixel array (437,664 total pixels)
- Single shot color image
- .002 sec to 9.3 hrs exposure range
- 16-bit A/D conversion
- 12V thermoelectric cooling
- Removable IR filter
- USB 2 interface to computer
"Two different views of M42, the great nebula in Orion: top view 6x20 sec exposure with the Meade DSI I C; bottom view 40x20 sec exposure with the Orion SSDSIii, both 1st time imaging pics from suburban skies. Note that images are NOT to scale"
Fast forward to the third week of January. I started writing this blog last week with the hopes that I would have time to give it a test run on the MLK long weekend. Weather was not very cooperative and the moon was only slightly past full (full moon was on Wed), but I did finally get out under light polluted skies to try out the new CCD. Firstly MaxIm DL was quite easy to use. I printed out parts of the online manual for the CCD, and made a cheat sheet for focusing, image capture, dark subtraction that I could take out into the field and not have to worry about lugging out the paper manual. That helped tremendously. I spent a total of 45 minutes under the stars last night trying out the CCD. I had my usual setup, Celestron NexStar 102GT, my camping chair, the HP Laptop and the Orion SSDSIII. As per nom, I screwed on the 0.5x Orion focal reducer and the Orion SkyGlow filter (I generally find that this is required as the sky fogs really quickly and I get an ugly reddish background when I image from suburbia without this filter). Here are my thought's and notes on this CCD after using it for a quick test run:
- MaxIm DL is easy to use and more user intuitive than Meade's Envisage. There are different windows for stretching the histogram and for camera controls.
- The CCD's focal point was very, very close to the limit of my scopes backfocus, with the 0.5x reducer and SkyGlow filter screwed in. Will try imaging without the diagonal, although the CCD might not come to focus as in the Meade DSI.
- I did not have any problems doing 20 second subs, other than the occasional blurred image from the mount working to center the object.
- I could not get natural color images of M42. The images I took all had the annoying green/blue cast and the color balance is all out of whack. I could not get rid of it in PS (see final combined image above). Anyone has any ideas please let me know. This was not a problem in the Meade DSI (also in the image above for comparison).
- The software does not automatically stack the images for you. I found it to be an annoyance and an inconvinience as you won't know if you are getting good stacks unless you do the pre-processing stack in the field (and this is a very involved process better suited to indoor work as you have to open all images and then select two stars to counter field rotation, a problem with alt-az GOTO mounts...hence the Meade DSI will be a better "field" CCD)
- The FOV is definately bigger in this CCD, but not by much. Image scale is identical.
- Noise seems to be very minimal, even without TEC cooling running so images are less grainy than the Meade's.
- Due to its heft, one has to be careful when putting the cam, into the diagonal as it will cause the scope to sag and you will lose your object in the FOV. The Meade DSI by contrast weights next to nothing
Hopefully you've made some progress in fixing the Deep Space CCD, or will by the end of this month. Found an interesting video on how to hook up a camcorder to the eyepiece end of a scope - might be able to do some video astronomy sometime soon, at least for the planets.
ReplyDeleteI need to get a chance to try it out to fix the problem and the weather is just not cooperating.
ReplyDeleteI'd there is a way, you should give it a go. If you can find a way to xonvert the video file formats to one that works with say Registax, you couls potentially get some very good stills.
Pointed my video camera through the eyepiece once to get video of Saturn and the Moon - that was my first and only foray into video astronomy. I would like to do some more work with my camcorder before even considering an astronomical camera. For the latter, I think the technology is still evolving - better to wait if I want to seriously get into it. I also own a book called "Video Astronomy" by Steve Massey, but it's from 2004.
ReplyDeleteHow did it turn out? The shots I mean. I have been thinking of getting a smart phone adapter from Orion so I can make videos of planets and the moon through my various scopes. It will be fun seeing that none of my CCD cams are equipped to make vids.
ReplyDeleteI was excited to get my first video shots of Saturn even though kinda crude - I'll need to dig up the video clip... There's also the Orion Starshoot USB Eyepiece - 1/7" Color CMOS Sensor ($64.95).
ReplyDeleteI think the USB video ep will be good for the moon and brighter planets.....not deep sky as it has a CMOS chip.
ReplyDeleteYes - I expect the same with using just my camcorder (i.e. solar system objects only).
ReplyDeleteYou might be able to snag brighter DSOs such as open clusters and perhaps M42. You should try...start with M45.
ReplyDelete